Driver v. Fitzpatrick
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
McCLELLAN, j.
Statutory ejectment instituted by appellee against appellant. In addition to the general affirmative charge with hypothesis, given at plaintiff’s instance, the court, through supplementary statements to the jury, in effect directed a verdict for plaintiff in so far as adverse possession was concerned. Under the tendencies of phases of the evidence designed to show defendant’s adverse possession, under color of title, of the quarter section in question for 10 years —an issue of fact for the jury to determine —this action of the court was error. Shipp v. Shelton, 193 Ala. 658, 69…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shipp v. SheltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Hooper v. Bankhead & BankheadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Goodson v. BrothersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Shepard v. Mount Vernon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Steed v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sovereign Camp, W. O .W. v. HoomesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Shepherd v. Scott's ChapelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Williams v. OatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Adams v. WoodsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Gaston v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.