Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael Franklin Einfeldt
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 23, 1998No. 97-1650PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoken, Circuit Judge
Michael Einfeldt appeals his conviction and sentence for armed robbery of a Waterloo, Iowa, food store and for conspiracy to violate the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951. On appeal, Einfeldt argues ,(1) the district court 1 committed evidentiary errors by requiring Ein- feldt to stipulate to one or more felony convictions for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), by allowing the government to impeach him with a prior robbery conviction, by admitting co-conspirator hearsay, and by limiting cross exam of a government witness about prison misconduct; (2) the court deprived Einfeldt of due process by…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. William Maurice SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- United States v. Catherine PapajohnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. CapozziCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.