Legal Opinion

United States v. Capozzi

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 6, 2003No. 00-1670PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Circuit Judge.

This case arises from defendant Derek Capozzi’s unlawful attempt to force a used car dealer to refund the purchase price of a truck with which he was dissatisfied. After a ten-day trial, a jury convicted Capozzi of being a felon in possession of a firearm, see 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), attempted extortion affecting interstate commerce, see 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a) (the “Hobbs Act”), and use of a firearm during the attempted extortion, see 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Capozzi challenges his convictions on several grounds. We affirm.

I

We set forth the facts underlying Capozzi’s convictions…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. United States v. HallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Vincent A. Cianci, Jr., Frank E. Corrente, and Richard E. AutielloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Morales-MachucaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  4. Sanchez v. Triple-S Management, Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Jimenez-TorresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API