Legal Opinion

Emerson v. Kusano

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 23, 2014No. 100812086; A149997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court granted plaintiffs motion to reform the terms of an agreement settling plaintiffs personal injury action. Defendant contends that the trial court should have rescinded, rather than reformed, the agreement. We conclude that the trial court erred in reforming the contract and therefore reverse and remand.

The facts are undisputed. Plaintiff brought an action against defendant for personal injuries she sustained in an automobile accident, alleging damages of $171,000. The parties entered into settlement negotiations. On July 22,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Jensen v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Pioneer Resources, LLC v. D. R. Johnson Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Newton/Boldt v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Oregon Education Ass'n v. Oregon Taxpayers UnitedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. GutierrezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Vukanovich v. KineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. Bishop v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Hamlin v. HamlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API