Legal Opinion
Kelly v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 26, 2006No. B176552PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERLUSS, P. J.
Recognizing a local government employer might dismiss an employee after determining the employee is incapacitated and unable to perform his or her job duties or those of an alternative position only to have the county retirement board subsequently conclude the employee is not entitled to a disability retirement, the Legislature in 1970 amended the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 (Gov. Code, § 31450 et seq.) 1 to add language designed to protect the affected employee. In addition to confirming the role of the county retirement board as the final arbiter of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Santa Clara County Counsel Attorneys Ass'n v. WoodsideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Dolan-King v. Rancho Santa Fe Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Caloca v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Stephens v. County of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Tapia v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Davis v. Los Angeles Unified School District Personnel CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Mooney v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Davis v. LAUSD PERSONNEL COM'NCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Hott v. College of the Sequoias Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.