Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Lozano

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided October 14, 1998No. 04-98-00260-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANGELINI, Justice.

Pete Joe Lozano appeals from the denial of the relief requested in his pre-trial application for writ of habeas corpus. In one point of error, Lozano contends that the trial court erred in denying the requested relief because his prosecution is barred by his constitutional right to be protected from double jeopardy. We affirm the order of the trial court.

Factual and Procedural Background

Lozano is an inmate at the Texas Department of Criminal Justice — Institutional Division. He has been charged by indictment with the offense of riot pursuant to section 42.02 of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Stennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Ex Parte ChappellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Covarrubias v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice—Institutional Division, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  2. State v. Almendarez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  3. Ex Parte: Joanna Gasperson, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
  4. Ex Parte: Joanna Gasperson, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
  5. Jesse Covarrubias v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API