Legal Opinion

In re C.E.L.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 19, 2005No. COA04-1349Published

1Opinion of the Court

McGEE, Judge.

Respondent, the paternal aunt of C.E.L., appeals from a permanency planning order placing custody and guardianship of C.E.L. with C.E.L.'s maternal great-grandmother, M.R.O. C.E.L.'s natural mother is deceased. C.E.L.'s natural father has not participated in the proceedings regarding C.E.L.'s placement. Respondent and her husband (R.E.H.) had obtained a temporary, nonprejudicial custody order for C.E.L. pursuant to an action brought under Chapter 50 of the North Carolina General Statutes (Chapter 50). R.E.H. is not a party to this appeal.

The evidence at the permanency planning…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Viar v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Matter of HelmsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  3. In Re WeilerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Culler v. HamlettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. ThornburgSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API