Legal Opinion

United States v. Blohm

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 10, 1984No. 83 Cr. 303 (RWS)PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendant William Blohm (“Blohm”) has been indicted for mailing two threatening letters to a federal judge and his clerk, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 876 and 1503. The Government has moved pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4244 to have this court determine whether defendant is competent to stand trial on these charges. For the reasons stated below, the court finds that Blohm is incompetent to stand trial within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 4244. Blohm is committed to the custody of Attorney General of the United States pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246 until he is declared…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of Defense v. Arlo TatumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Turner, Albert JamesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  2. Damacio Y. Torres v. K.W. Prunty, in His Capacity as WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. BrakkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Martin v. DuggerDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1988
  5. Provenzano v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API