Legal Opinion

In Re the Contempt of the Supreme Court of Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1997No. 45S00-9703-CO-171PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This matter comes before this Court on an Order to Appear and Show Cause directing the respondent, Stephan J. Lustina, to appear and show cause why he should not be held in contempt of this Court. This Court has inherent and statutory authority to punish contempt of Court by fine and imprisonment. IC 33-2-1-4; In re Curry, 673 N.E.2d 755 (Ind.1996); In re Crumpacker, 431 N.E.2d 91 (Ind.1982). 1

The respondent was admitted to the Bar of this state in 1972. On April 6, 1995, he was suspended from the practice of law for a period of not less than one (1) year, without automatic reinstatement, for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of CrumpackerIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Matter of LustinaIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Matter of AnonymousIndiana Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Contempt of the Supreme Court of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API