Legal Opinion

Severns v. California Highway Indemnity Exchange

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 20, 1929No. Docket No. 6953PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMBERSON, J., pro tem.

Appeal by plaintiff, Margery Severns, from a judgment in favor of defendant after the trial court had granted a motion for nonsuit.

The action is one to recover damages for personal injuries, medical expenses and loss of wearing apparel sustained by plaintiff on May 31, 1925, in a collision between an automobile, operated as a so-called jitney bus, in which plaintiff and a woman friend were passengers for hire, and another automobile at the intersection of Fell and Franklin Streets, in the city of San Francisco. The operator of the jitney bus was Sam Euphrat, who was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re CardinalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Milliron v. DittmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. State v. NutterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Clark v. GoodwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. New York Indemnity Company v. EwenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hunt v. AuthierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Van Derhoof v. ChambonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Mull v. WienbargWyoming Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Wiggins v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Haines v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API