Legal Opinion
Crespo v. Kreisel Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 10, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward H. Lehner, J.
*183The question before me is whether plaintiffs claim of age discrimination under Executive Law § 296 is subject to the arbitration provision of the collective bargaining agreement (the Agreement) entered into between plaintiffs union and the Realty Advisory Board on Labor Relations Incorporated, a trade association of real estate operators to which defendants belong.
Plaintiff, who had been the superintendent of the cooperative apartment building owned by defendant 160 West End Avenue Owners Corp. (West End) and managed by defendant Kreisel Company, Inc.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Fletcher v. Kidder, Peabody & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Wertheim & Co. v. HalpertNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Basura v. U.S. Home Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Crespo v. Kreisel Co.New York Supreme Court · 1997