Legal Opinion · Dissent

Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Westfall

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 2, 1935No. 42693Published

1DissentKintzinger, J.

(dissenting) — I find myself unable to agree with the foregoing opinion, for the following reasons:

This is an action to foreclose a real estate mortgage upon an eighty-acre farm, forty acres of which constituted defendants’ homestead. A decree of foreclosure was duly entered and a special execution issued thereon. Prior to the date of the sheriff’s sale, the defendant served notice on the sheriff, demanding that the nonhomestead forty he sold first. At the sale, the sheriff received a bona fide bid of $2,000 for the nonexempt land, but refused to sell it separately. He then offered the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sheakley v. MechlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  2. Robert Moody & Son v. Century Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Boyd v. EllisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
  4. Finken v. SchramSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  5. White v. RowleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1877

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API