Legal Opinion

Finken v. Schram

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 5, 1931No. 40633PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKindig, J.

This proceeding to foreclose a real estate mortgage presents two distinct controversies, generally speaking. The first relates to the existence of the mortgage, and the second involves the pleadings for and against, and evidence to sustain, the appointment of a receiver.

A. N. Finken, the plaintiff and appellee, maintains that he has a valid mortgage executed by the defendants-appellants, N. W. Schram, and his wife, Josephine Schram, covering certain land in Shelby County, and because the mortgagors are delinquent, the appellee urges that he is entitled to the foreclosure thereof, aided by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sheakley v. MechlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  2. Lee v. FletcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  3. Lynch v. DonahoeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Fetes v. O'LaughlinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  5. Louis v. HansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kerby v. LuhrsArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Moore v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  3. Coalition for Political Honesty v. State Board of ElectionsIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Bachelder v. WoodsideSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  5. Woods v. SchmittSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API