State v. Shaw
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.
Defendant George Brian Shaw was found guilty of attempted theft in the first degree after a jury trial. In light of our conclusion that the conviction must be reversed and the ease remanded for a new trial, we find it necessary to discuss only defendant’s claim of prosecutorial misconduct in the cross-examination of Shaw’s co-indictee, William Edward Meador.
According to the prosecution’s theory, Shaw and Meador proposed a plan to one Deborah Ann Clemans whereby Ms. Clemans’ automobile would be deliberately driven into Shaw’s already damaged automobile, and the insurance proceeds split among…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Namet v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. AmoryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- State v. HiteshewCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. FroatsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976