Legal Opinion

State v. Shaw

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 17, 1975No. 82784PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.

Defendant George Brian Shaw was found guilty of attempted theft in the first degree after a jury trial. In light of our conclusion that the conviction must be reversed and the ease remanded for a new trial, we find it necessary to discuss only defendant’s claim of prosecutorial misconduct in the cross-examination of Shaw’s co-indictee, William Edward Meador.

According to the prosecution’s theory, Shaw and Meador proposed a plan to one Deborah Ann Clemans whereby Ms. Clemans’ automobile would be deliberately driven into Shaw’s already damaged automobile, and the insurance proceeds split among…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Namet v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. State v. AmoryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  5. State v. HiteshewCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. State v. FroatsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. State v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API