Legal Opinion
Principe v. United States
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 7, 1962No. 61-C-260PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARTELS, District Judge.
Motion by defendant United States of America (herein “the Government”), pursuant to Rules 15(a) and 13(g), Fed. Rules Civ.Proc., 28 U.S.C.A., for leave to file an amended answer asserting an additional defense and two cross-claims over against defendant Marrón. The motion is not opposed by plaintiffs, but is opposed by defendant Marrón.
*302The complaint alleges that as a result of the negligence of the two defendants their respective vehicles collided and consequently one of the two vehicles struck the automobile containing the plaintiffs. The Government alleges that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Rochester v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Fedden v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Anderson v. Liberty Fast Freight Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Middleton v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Iroquois Gas Corp. v. International Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pyramid Condominium Ass'n. v. MorganDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1985
- Stearn v. MacLean-Hunter Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969