Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nolan Deeds v. City of Marion, Iowa, St. Luke's Work Well Solutions St. Luke's Healthcare, and Iowa Health System

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 22, 2018No. 16-1666Published

1Dissent

APPEL, Justice (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent.

A flat-out ban from employment on anyone with a recurrence of multiple sclerosis (MS) within the last three years is precisely the kind of stereotyping that the disability-discrimination provisions of the Iowa Civil Rights Act (ICRA) are designed to prevent. How is it that such stereotyping was applied to Nolan Deeds? The evasion of the ICRA was achieved when the employer contracted out the physical examination to a third party.

Can it be that an employer can avoid responsibility for disability discrimination by contracting out the physical…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Katherine L. Taylor v. Phoenixville School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  3. Louis P. Forrisi v. Otis R. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  4. Fernando C. HARVEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thorne BLAKE, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  5. Hamilton v. RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API