Legal Opinion

Universal Construction Co. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 28, 1999No. 98-9519PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Universal Construction Company appeals a final order of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission affirming the imposition of a penalty against Universal under the “multi-em-ployer worksite” doctrine, based on a subcontractor’s violation of construction safety standards. We affirm.

The parties have stipulated to certain facts. Universal is a general contractor engaged in the construction business. In December 1996, Universal contracted with UMB Bank to construct a branch bank office in Independence, Missouri, and shortly thereafter, subcontracted…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ray MARSHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  3. Bates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Whirlpool Corp. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Anthony J. Melerine, Jr., Continental Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellant v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. PlottsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  2. Solis v. Summit Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  3. C & M Builders, LLC v. StrubCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  4. Hughes General Contractors, Inc. v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  5. F & H Coatings, LLC v. AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API