Legal Opinion

United States v. Shover

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 24, 1996No. 95-0890; Crim.App. No. 30728PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

GIERKE, Judge:

A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members at Norton Air Force Base, California, convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of wrongfully using methamphetamine, in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 912a. The adjudged and approved sentence provides for a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 4 months, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and sentence. 42 MJ 753 (1995).

We granted review of the following issues:

I

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  2. United States v. MukesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  3. United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  4. United States v. GardnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  5. United States v. ShoverUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. NapoleonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  2. United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  3. United States v. BrowningCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  4. United States v. ShafferCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  5. United States v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API