Tuggle v. Netherland
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
In Zant v. Stephens, 462 U. S. 862 (1983), we held that a death sentence supported by multiple aggravating circumstances need not always be set aside if one aggravator is found to be invalid. Id., at 886-888. We noted that our holding did not apply in States in which the jury is instructed to weigh aggravating circumstances against mitigating circumstances in determining whether to impose the death penalty. Id., at 874, n. 12, 890. In this case, the Virginia Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit construed Zant as establishing a rule that in nonweighing States a death…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Zant v. StephensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Johnson v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Tuggle v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Tuggle v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Robert Glen Coe, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Ricky Bell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Commonwealth v. TedfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- State v. RousanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Goodwin v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Brown v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.