Legal Opinion
Penmanta Corp. v. Hollis
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 15, 1988No. 55A01-8611-CV-300PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Judge.
The defendant-appellant Penmanta Corporation (Penmanta) appeals from a $300,-000 jury verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff-appellee Edward Hollis (Hollis). For the reasons stated hereafter, we reverse.
Hollis and his wife operated a business in Nashville, Indiana, known as the Toy Chest. They sold toys, crafts and collect ibles. As a part of that business, a miniature cireus exhibit which was hand carved by Hollis in quarter-inch scale was on display. Admission to the display was 50 cents for adults and 25 cents for children. The display portrayed the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Myers v. MarisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- City of Bloomington v. KuruzovichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Newnam Manufacturing, Inc. v. Transcontinental Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Pike County v. State Ex Rel. HardinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Johnson v. BucklenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harrison v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Houston v. BooherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Powers v. City of LafayetteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- City of New Albany v. Board of Commissioners of the County of Floyd, New Albany Floyd County Indiana Building AuthorityIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- Mid-American Salt LLC v. Bob & Dave's Lawn and Landscape Maintenance, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.