Utica Fire Insurance v. Gozdziak
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiff insurer brought this action seeking a declaration that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insureds, who are defendants in an underlying action. The underlying action was brought on behalf of an infant, Richard Gozdziak, to recover for injuries sustained in a fireworks accident. The accident occurred while Richard, whose parents are divorced and whose mother has physical custody of him, was making an overnight visit to the home of his late…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Reinsurance Ass'n of Minnesota v. HanksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Horace Mann Insurance v. StarkDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997
- New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. SweetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Chautauqua Patrons Insurance v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Qiu v. Livingston Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.