Legal Opinion

People v. Huskins

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 1966No. Crim. 9256PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFleming, J.

Larry Huskins was charged in eight counts with sex offenses against his three natural daughters, ages six, three, and two, and in a non jury trial was convicted on one charge and acquitted on the others. Sexual psychopathy proceedings were initiated, but a jury found the defendant was not a sexual psychopath. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5512.) Thereafter, defendant, whose only prior offense was a 1948 conviction for resorting (Mun. Code 41.07), was sentenced to state prison. At all times, both in court and out of court, Huskins vigorously denied the charges against him. The principal issue is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. People v. SuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. People v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. MattisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. People v. RandleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. People v. ClausonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. People v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. People v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API