Louis Cohen v. Louie L. Wainwright
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
We have concluded on the merits that oral argument is unnecessary in this case. Accordingly, we have directed the Clerk to place the cause on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties of this fact in writing. See Rule 18 of the Rules of the Court, Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I, and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir. 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I.
Louis Cohen, petitioner, appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We affirm.
A jury found Cohen and a co-defendant guilty of the crime of robbery. The state court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- James Leo Huth v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. George v. ArlenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- United States v. Angelo PaccioneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Vitiello v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bocanegra v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- State v. BeesonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977