M.P.P. v. R.R.E.

Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., Judge

Introduction

R.R.E. (Mother) appeals from the judgment of the trial court in this paternity and child custody case. She argues the trial court erred in failing to make findings of fact as required under Section 452.375.6 RSMo. (Cum.Supp. 2005),1 and the parenting plan and name change were not in the best interest of the child. We reverse and remand to the trial court.

Background

Mother and M.P.P. (Father) were both living in St. Louis, Missouri, where they were involved in an off-and-on relationship that resulted in Mother’s pregnancy. Mother gave birth to B.R.S.E.…