M.P.P. v. R.R.E.

I. INTRODUCTION

R.R.E. (Mother) appeals the trial court’s judgment on remand in this paternity and child custody action. In her four points on appeal, Mother argues the trial court erred as the parenting plan set forth in the *782judgment and name change were not in the best interests of B.R.S.E. (the parties’ Minor Child). For the following reasons, we reverse and remand to the trial court.

II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This case was originally filed by M.P.P. (Father) on September 6, 2012, to establish paternity and custody of the Minor Child. After conducting a hearing on January 7, 2014,…