Legal Opinion

Vournas v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided August 12, 1986No. 315-85LPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAYER, Judge.

Plaintiff sues here under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. § 4653, for reimbursement of taxes incurred when defendant took his property in a condemnation suit. Defendant denies liability because the tax does not fall within the terms of the Act and reimbursement would therefore require federal payment of taxes to a state without waiver of immunity. The case is submitted on cross-motions for summary judgment.

Background

Plaintiff George Yournas owned approximately 200.67 acres of land along River Road in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Mother's Restaurant Incorporated v. Mama's Pizza, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. Bromley v. McCaughnSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Pittman v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mayne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API