Legal Opinion

Frick Co. v. Ashworth

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 5, 1946No. 2 Div. 220Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

Thisis a suitby appellant against appellee on notes,'representing the'balance claimed to be unpaid onthe'purchase price of certain machinery.

Defendant had a’contract'sepárate' fronj that by which he-purchased'-the'machinery1, which made him-what was denominated iri it a dealer for appellant in the. matter of the sale of'the machinery; -By it appelle.e was to be entitled to commissions'on sales made by him-or with his■ assistance. The commissions should be ■ “all proceeds obtained in excess of’1 a certain named’percent of current list prices.' 'On such' basis lié claimed a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moore v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Jones v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Hester v. First Nat. Bank of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Spencer v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Abercrombie v. Martin & Hoyt Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API