Legal Opinion

Riddle v. Blair

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 18, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Coosa Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. S. L. Brewer. Action by D. H. Riddle against George Blair. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Coosa Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. S. L. Brewer. Action by D. H. Riddle against George Blair. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. The pleadings and the facts will be found set out in a former report of this case in 148 Ala. 461, 42 South. 560. The charges refused are as follows: (5) “I charge you that, if Tom Dawson had sold the seed to Riddle, he could not, by telling Blair not to let anybody have the seed except on his order, defeat Riddle’s right to demand and receive the seed of Blair.” (6) “If you are rteasonably satisfied from the evidence that the seed was…

1Opinion of the CourtMayfield, J.

The facts and the law governing this case are sufficiently stated in the former report and opinion of this case . See 148 Ala. 461, 42 South. 560. The pleadings and issues in this case, as was pointed out in the former opinion, are entirely too numerous. All the pleadings and all the proof shown by the records on both appeals, show that the only question in the case is one of conversion. One count in trover is all the pleading necessary to determine all of the rights of *316both parties. This much was said on the former appeal, and if possible, it more clearly appears on- this appeal.

The evidence…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Riddle v. BlairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blair v. RiddleAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Ashland Oil Mill & Fertilizer Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. Abasi Bros. v. Louisville & N. R.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API