Legal Opinion

Dowdell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 5, 1897PublishedCited by 50 opinions

Petition, filed August 6,1897, for a writ of habeas corpus. Hearing before Lathrop, J., who ordered the petition to be dismissed, and, at the petitioner’s request, reported the case for the determination of the full court. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The only ground for the petitioner’s discharge which is set forth in the petition, or relied on in argument, is that the provisions of statute under which he was committed are unconstitutional, as being in violation of Article 12 of the Declaration of Rights, and of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The former provides that no subject shall be deprived of his liberty but by the judgment of his peers, or the law of the land. The latter, that no State shall deprive any person of liberty without due process of law.

So far as the Declaration of Rights is concerned,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Missouri v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Walker v. SauvinetSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Late Corp. of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. White v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Finch v. GoldsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Ashley v. Three Justices of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. Barry v. HallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API