Twyman v. Robinson
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Justice.
We granted certiorari in this case to consider whether a plan of self-insurance for vehicle liability must include uninsured motorist coverage. The Court of Appeals, in Twyman v. Robinson, 176 Ga. App. 687 (337 SE2d 375) (1985), held that uninsured motorist coverage is not required in a plan of self-insurance. We disagree and reverse.
Ricky Robinson’s car, which was uninsured, collided with the Twymans’ car, which was covered by a plan of self-insurance created and administered by the Atlanta Car For Hire Association, Inc. Mr. Twyman and his daughter filed separate suits against…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Modesta v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Johnson v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Twyman v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
3Cited by29 opinions
- Ellis v. Rhode Island Public Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991
- Hartford Insurance v. Hertz Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- McSorley v. Hertz Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. BloomIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Passamano v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.