Legal Opinion

In Re Legislative Apportionment

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1961PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

228 Or. 562 (1961)

364 P.2d 1004

IN THE MATTER OF THE REVIEW OF CHAPTER 482, OREGON LAWS, 1961, RELATING TO THE APPORTIONMENT OF SENATORS AND REPRESENTATIVES.

McKINLEY ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued September 18, 1961.

Petition granted September 22, 1961.

Vernon Cook, Gresham, argued the cause and submitted a brief for petitioners Charles McKinley, Donald G. Balmer and Howard E. Dean. With him on the brief were Dirk D. Snel and Reuben Lenske, Portland.

Edward N. Fadeley, Eugene, argued the cause and submitted a brief in propria persona.

Wm. S. McLennan, Portland, argued the cause and submitted…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Review of Chapter 482, Oregon Laws, 1961Oregon Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McCall v. Legislative AssemblyOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Hovet v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Ater v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Ater v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Cargo v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API