Legal Opinion
McCall v. Legislative Assembly
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 23, 1981No. 28016, 28042, 28045, 28061, 28064, 27946, 28054PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*667LINDE, J.
In 1952, the people of Oregon initiated and adopted a constitutional amendment to assure themselves of a constitutional apportionment of the Legislative Assembly after each federal census. The amendment provided for review by this court of challenges to a reapportionment measure enacted by the Legislative Assembly, for preparation of a reapportionment by the Secretary of State if the assembly enacts no reapportionment measure or enacts a faulty one, and for further review by this court of any reapportionment thus prepared by the Secretary of State. Or Const Art IV, § 6. The present…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- White v. RegesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gaffney v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- O'BRIEN v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hovet v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Benton County v. Friends of Benton CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Reapportionment of the Colorado General AssemblySupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Hartung v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Kallenberger v. BuchananSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.