Legal Opinion

Ratliff v. Davis

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 19, 1956No. 17805PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss

The parties to this litigation are here in reverse order of their appearance in the trial court, where defendants in error were plaintiffs and plaintiffs in error were defendants. We will refer to them as they appeared in the trial court, or by name.

Plaintiffs’ complaint, stated in three claims, alleged that plaintiffs as lessors entered into a written lease with Ratliff-Gore Motors, Inc., a corporation, as lessee, on a business property in Las Animas, Colorado. Lessee was to occupy the property “for the sale and repair of automobiles and as an automobile garage and the sale of automobile…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mulock v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  2. Gregory v. FilbeckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  3. George Kraft Co. v. HellerIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Wright v. Haley, Sr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. House v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. B & H Auto Supply, Inc. v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  2. Waterman v. PerrottaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  3. Schlussel v. Emmanuel Roth Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API