Legal Opinion
Wonneman v. Global Grab Technologies Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 25, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2026-1267Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MATTHEW DAVID WONNEMAN, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 26-cv-1267 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell GLOBAL GRAB TECHNOLOGIES INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Matthew David Wonneman brings suit against his former employer, defendant Global Grab Technologies Inc., alleging retaliation in violation of the whistleblower provision of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2013 (“NDAA”), 41 U.S.C. § 4712, and the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h), for disclosing his concerns about his supervisor’s alleged manipulation…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.