Clement, Bane & Co. v. Drybread
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Palo Alto District Court. —IIoN. W. B. QuartoN, Judge. ActioN at law, aided by attachment, on two promissory notes and an account. Defendant filed an answer and counterclaim. There was a trial to jury, verdict for.defendant on his counterclaim, and, from a judgment rendered thereon, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtWaterman, J.
— While1 many of the facts were coutro-verted below they are practically- conceded so- far as the questions presented on this appeal are concerned. Plaintiff firm was engaged in the wholesale clothing business in the city of Chicago. Defendant was a retailer in.the same line, at Emmetsburg, in this state. Defendant started in •'business at Emmetsburg at the solicitation of plaintiff,, and under a contract with it, which was partly written and *703partly oral. The oral portion of the contract, as defendant claims it, was substantially as follows: Plaintiff was to furnish defendant all the clothing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kellow v. Central Iowa R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Hunt v. Iowa Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Dickson v. HarrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Peterson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Vaughn v. Smith & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1882
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Texas Farm Bureau Cotton Ass'n v. StovallTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Scott v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Gibson v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- In Re Estate of KahlSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- Shull v. McCrumSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.