Granger v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.
This appeal presents the single question whether plaintiff’s cause of action is barred by a release given by him which in form released and discharged the railway company from ■■all claims which the plaintiff- had at the time the release was signed "or'which' he might’thereafter have on account .of personal injuries sustained at the time the plaintiff -was injured in- the coursé óf his- employment by the railway company.'
The release was signed in the offices of the railway company in Chicago six months after the injury, at a time when plaintiff was still undergoing treatment which caused him…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Great Northern Ry. Co. v. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. HambrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Jacobson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Lusted v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
- Brown v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Denton v. UtleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Caudill v. CHATHAM MANUFACTURING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Dansby v. BuckArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Nilsson v. KruegerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
- Doyle v. TeasdaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.