Legal Opinion

Granger v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1927PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

This appeal presents the single question whether plaintiff’s cause of action is barred by a release given by him which in form released and discharged the railway company from ■■all claims which the plaintiff- had at the time the release was signed "or'which' he might’thereafter have on account .of personal injuries sustained at the time the plaintiff -was injured in- the coursé óf his- employment by the railway company.'

The release was signed in the offices of the railway company in Chicago six months after the injury, at a time when plaintiff was still undergoing treatment which caused him…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Great Northern Ry. Co. v. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. HambrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  3. Jacobson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Lusted v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Brown v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Denton v. UtleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Caudill v. CHATHAM MANUFACTURING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Dansby v. BuckArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Nilsson v. KruegerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Doyle v. TeasdaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API