Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Four Bros. Boat Works, Inc. v. S & SF, INC.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided April 5, 2001No. 01-99-01344-CVPublished

1ConcurrenceCohen, Justice

I agree the judgment should be affirmed. Appellants, who are subtenants, received all they were entitled to under their contract with the original tenant — a right to enjoy the full term of any extension option exercised by the original tenant. They got that when they retained the possession under the sublease until April 30, 1997. Appellants had no right to force their lessor, Grasso, to exercise its second option to extend for another ten years until 2007. On the contrary, Grasso had a right not to exercise its second option to extend, and it exercised its right not to extend by entering…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Haddad v. Tyler Production Credit Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  2. Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. v. Republic Ins.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Doyle v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Stewart v. Kuskin & Rotberg, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Hampton v. LumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API