Legal Opinion

State v. Boren

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1954No. 32485PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

— The first chapter. In State v. Boren, 36 Wn. (2d) 522, 219 P. (2d) 566 (1950), this court held, under the provisions of Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), § 10031-6 [cf. RCW 18.32.020], that it is a reasonable exercise of the state’s police power to include in the definition of practicing dentistry, a person who owns, maintains, or operates an office for the practice of dentistry; and that unlicensed persons, whose activities come within such definition, should be enjoined from such practice. Consequently, on February 15, 1951, the trial court permanently enjoined A. E. Boren and W. W. Shepherd from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BorenWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. State v. BorenWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Tomlinson v. BeanWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Peterson v. SchoonoverWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Arnold v. NAT. UNION MARINE COOKS ETC.Washington Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Glo-Klen Co. v. Far West Chemical ProductsWashington Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API