York Paid Firemen's Pension Fund Board v. Orendorff
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Mencer,
The sole issue in this appeal by Frederick J. Orendorff (claimant) is whether the York Paid Firemen’s Pension Fund Board (Board) should include longevity increments1 paid to a fireman in computing his retirement pension. Section 6 of York City Ordinance 16-1947, as amended, York Administrative Code §171.-06 (1947), provides that claimant shall receive a pension equal to “one-half the yearly salary of such member at the time of his retirement.” “Salary” is not defined in the ordinance, and we are asked to determine the dimensions of that term.2
Claimant, relying on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kane v. Policemen's Relief & Pension FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Rockwell v. York County Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Kelly v. LovelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Newhouse v. Board of PensionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
3Cited by3 opinions
- Palyok v. Borough of West MifflinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Palyok v. Borough of West MifflinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Kohtz v. City of YorkNebraska Court of Appeals · 1992