Legal Opinion
Quesnel v. Quesnel
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided June 24, 1988No. 86-020Published
1Opinion of the Court
549 A.2d 644 (1988)
Sarah E. QUESNEL
v.
Carl R. QUESNEL.
No. 86-020.
Supreme Court of Vermont.
June 24, 1988.
Patrick L. Biggam, Montpelier, for plaintiff-appellee.
McKee, Giuliani & Cleveland, Montpelier, for defendant-appellant.
Before ALLEN, C.J., PECK, J., BARNEY, C.J. (Ret.), COSTELLO, District Judge (Ret.) and MARTIN, Superior Judge, Specially Assigned.
ALLEN, Chief Justice.
The parties were divorced by decree of the Washington Superior Court after a contested hearing. Defendant husband appeals the trial court's property disposition and its award of permanent maintenance to plaintiff. We affirm.
Def…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hilder v. St. PeterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- Pfeil v. Rutland District CourtSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
- State v. LafayetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- State v. MaguireSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- Quesnel v. QuesnelSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.