Legal Opinion

Jennings v. Ruidoso Racing Association

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1968No. 8140PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOBLE, Justice.

Cecil Jennings, asserting that he was hired as comptroller of the Ruidoso Racing Association for the period May 1, 1963 to April 30, 1964 at a salary of $1,000 per month and was wrongfully discharged on May 18, 1963, sued for his salary. He has appealed from a judgment denying recovery.

The basis of the trial court’s denial of recovery was that (1) there is no sufficient memorandum in writing of the oral contract of employment to satisfy the Statute of Frauds, and (2) the action of the corporation’s board of directors in employing Jennings as comptroller was ultra vires…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Marks v. . CowdinNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Pitek v. McGuireNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Keirsey v. HirschNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Campos De Suenos, Ltd. v. County of BernalilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Skarda v. SkardaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Balboa Const. Co., Inc. v. GoldenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. O'KEEFFE v. BryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  5. Aragon v. BoydNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API