Legal Opinion

Baxter v. Campbell

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1903PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Codington county, Hon. Julian Bennett, Judge. • Action by Raymond B. Baxter against R. F. Campbell. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFuller, J.

'The complaint in this action for damages states, in substance, that the defendant, a physician and .surgeon, was employed by plaintiff to set and heal the bones of his left leg, broken between the knee and ankle on the 26th day of November, 1901; “that the defendant so carelessly, negligently and unskillfully” performed the service, that i.t became necessary in/the month of May, 1902, to .employ a different physician and surgeon, at the expense of $200, and to his damage in that amount; “that by reason of said careless, negligent, and unskillful mannér of setting, treating, and caring for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Philadelphia, Wilmington, & Baltimore Railroad v. QuigleySupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  2. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railroad v. Le GierseTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  3. People v. OldhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Kennedy v. North Missouri RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  5. Sullivan v. Oregon Railway & Navigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1885

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Schaffer v. Edward D. Jones & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Matter of Certif. of Questions of LawSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Moberg v. ScottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Vreugdenhil v. First Bank of South Dakota, N.A.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Egan v. DotsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API