Legal Opinion
LETTIERI v. TD BANK
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 21, 2024No. 1:24-cv-00832Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE DAVID C. LETTIERI, Plaintiff, Civil No. 24-832 (RMB/SAK) v. OPINION TD BANK, Defendant. RENÉE MARIE BUMB, Chief United States District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon pro se Plaintiff David C. Lettieri’s Amended Complaint, [Docket No. 4 (“Am. Compl.”)], which requires the Court to conduct a screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). For the reasons set forth, Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint is DISMISSED IN PART while one claim PROCEEDS past screening. I. PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.