Ex Parte Rush
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Steve Rush and his wife Kim Rush petition for a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to vacate its orders compelling them to arbitrate their fraud and wantonness claims against Allied-Bruce Terminix Companies, Inc., d/b/a Terminix Service ("Terminix Service"); Terminix International, Inc.; Hal Worthington; and Mike Hobaugh. The Rushes filed separate complaints; however, the trial court consolidated the two cases and ordered that all claims be arbitrated. We deny the writ.
The Rushes are residents of Dale County. Terminix Service, a franchisee of Terminix International Company, L.P., a…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Lawler Mobile Homes, Inc. v. TarverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Ex Parte McNaughtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Old Republic Ins. Co. v. LanierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Georgia Power Co. v. PartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. v. BrunoSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Quality Truck and Auto Sales, Inc. v. YassineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Bowen v. Security Pest Control, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- McDougle v. SilvernellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Brown v. DensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.