Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Lindahl

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 29, 1960No. Gen. 47,687PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE MURPHY

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff, an employee of the City of Chicago, sued the Lindahls and Bernard Coffman in a third party common law action, to recover for personal injuries suffered by him as a result of being struck by the bucket of a “Backhoe,” a heavy-duty trench-digging machine, owned by the Lindahls, rented to the City, and operated by Coffman.

The jury returned a $250,000 verdict against the Lindahls and a not guilty verdict as to Coffman. Judgments were entered on both verdicts. On plaintiff’s post-trial motion, the court entered judgment…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Kahn v. James Burton Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Weinstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Densby v. BartlettIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Bunton v. Illinois Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Gundich v. Emerson-Comstock Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. United States v. Bennie L. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  3. Bunda v. HardwickMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Richard v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  5. Scully v. Otis Elevator Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1971

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API