Legal Opinion

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Watkins

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1895No. 204PublishedCited by 107 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Second District, in an appeal front Tarrant County. The opinion gives a full statement.

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Associate Justice.

—In September, 1889, the roadbed of plaintiff in-error, in the city-of Fort Worth, Texas, from the Union- Depot north to Seventeenth street, was constructed across a plot of ground not a public square or street, upon an elevation consisting in part of embankments and in part of a bridge and trestlework over a ravine. Said roadbed appears to have been wide enough for three tracks running practically parallel with each other, with the usual space between. On each side of the bridge was a plank walk, with hand rails, for the use of pedestrians crossing same. Said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. NeffTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Galveston City Railroad v. HewittTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. San Antonio Street Railway Co. v. HelmTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Lee v. TurnerTexas Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. Wininger v. Ft. Worth & Denver City Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Le Sage v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MaloneTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. HaywoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Ward v. CatheyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API