Legal Opinion
Plummer v. Hegel
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 22, 1989No. 85A02-8711-CV-00466PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BUCHANAN, Judge.
CASE SUMMARY
Appellant-plaintiff Alfred H. Plummer III (Plummer), as prosecuting attorney, appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees-defen-dants Philip H. Hegel, et al. [hereinafter collectively referred to as the County Auditor}, claiming the trial court erred as a matter of law in concluding that certain incentive payments may not be paid to Plummer by the County Auditor unless first approved by the Wabash County Council (County Council).
We reverse.
FACTS
The facts are undisputed. Plummer is the prosecuting attorney for the 27th Judicial…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Simon v. City of Auburn, Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Nahmias v. Trustees of Indiana UniversityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Ski World, Inc. v. FifeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Bell v. BinghamIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- M & K CORP. v. Farmers State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Balvich v. Balvich (In Re Balvich)District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991
- Opinion No. (1995), Nebraska Attorney General Reports1995