Bell v. Bingham
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BUCHANAN, Chief Judge.
CASE SUMMARY
Plaintiff-appellant Olin P. Bell (Olin) appeals the trial court's entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees Max and Beverly Ann Bingham [hereinafter collectively referred to as the Bing-hams] and John W. Vironet (Vironet) claiming the trial court erred by denying as untimely his petition to foreclose a judgment lien and his claim against Vironet, the sole distributee of the estate of Mary Ellen Bell (Mary).
We affirm.
FACTS
The facts viewed in a light most favorable to Olin are as follows: Olin and Mary were divorced in 1978 pursuant to a decree…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Sanders v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- McMahan v. Snap on Tool Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Wright v. GettingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Indiana State Highway Commission v. Bates & Rogers Construction, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Johnson County Farm Bureau Cooperative Ass'n v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1991
- Caylor-Nickel Clinic, P.C. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1991
- Marion County Sheriff's Merit Board v. Peoples Broadcasting Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1992
- In Re DunnUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.