Legal Opinion

Rumsey v. Schollman Bros. Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1952No. 33189PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

This is an action for damages against the defendant Schollman Bros. Co. based on alleged negligence in the operation of oil-burning salamanders on a construction job. At the close of the trial the court sustained a motion of the defendant for a directed verdict- and dismissed the action. Plaintiff appeals. We reverse and remand.

Carl C. Wilson, Inc. was a general contractor, constructing a multiple unit apartment house in Omaha. Schollman Bros. Co., a corporation, was a subcontractor of the plumbing installations and hereinafter is called defendant. DeBuse Brothers, a corporation, was the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weisenmiller v. NestorNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Koran v. Cudahy Packing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Adams v. Lilbourn Grain Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Baer v. SchaapNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Keene v. Chicago Bridge and Iron Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Topil v. Hub Hall Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. McGeary v. ReedOhio Court of Appeals · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API