Rumsey v. Schollman Bros. Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.
This is an action for damages against the defendant Schollman Bros. Co. based on alleged negligence in the operation of oil-burning salamanders on a construction job. At the close of the trial the court sustained a motion of the defendant for a directed verdict- and dismissed the action. Plaintiff appeals. We reverse and remand.
Carl C. Wilson, Inc. was a general contractor, constructing a multiple unit apartment house in Omaha. Schollman Bros. Co., a corporation, was a subcontractor of the plumbing installations and hereinafter is called defendant. DeBuse Brothers, a corporation, was the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Weisenmiller v. NestorNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- Koran v. Cudahy Packing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1916
- Adams v. Lilbourn Grain Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1932
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Baer v. SchaapNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
- Keene v. Chicago Bridge and Iron Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Topil v. Hub Hall Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- McGeary v. ReedOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.