Legal Opinion

Heimpel v. First National Bank and Trust Company

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 30, 1940No. Appeal, 50PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

Plaintiffs below, husband and wife, respectively, brought an action in trespass against the appellant bank, for damages by reason of the bank’s alleged wrongful conversion of certain securities deposited by them with the bank as collateral for a loan. They obtained a verdict for $2,619.93. The court below refused to enter judgment n. o. v. This appeal followed.

On October 19,1937, the bank held two notes of plaintiffs’, one was a demand note for $1,200 with interest from its date, July 23, 1937. No demand for payment was made prior to October 19tk and no interest…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wilson v. . LittleNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  2. Aarons v. Pub. Ser. B. L. Assn.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Heffner v. First Nat. Bk. of Hunt'donSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Kelter v. American Bankers Finance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Colonial Trust Co. v. Central Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bell, Secy. of Banking v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Better Bilt Door Co. v. OatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. United States v. First National Bank & Trust Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Bell v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Atlantic Union Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists v. Western Savings & Loan Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API